Fraud Prevention Starts with Accurate Freight Classification

Keith Peterson - January 27, 2026

When freight fraud is discussed, the focus is often on stolen identities, fake carriers, or forged documents. But one of the most overlooked—and most powerful—fraud prevention tools in the industry is accurate less-than-truckload (LTL) freight classification.

Freight classification is not just about rating or pricing. It establishes a shared, standardized understanding of what is being shipped, how it should be handled, and what risks it presents. When classification breaks down, ambiguity fills the gap—and ambiguity is exactly what fraudsters exploit.

At the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc.® (NMFTA)™, classification integrity is foundational to fraud prevention. That’s why the National Motor Freight Classification® (NMFC)™ includes detailed rules and guidance on Bills of Lading (BOLs), packaging, and liability, and why these freight characteristics are central to the Freight Classification Development Council’s (FCDC) work.

Why Ambiguity Fuels Freight Fraud

Fraud thrives when shipment information is vague, inconsistent, incomplete, or easily manipulated.

Inaccurate or sloppy classification creates uncertainty around what the freight actually is, how valuable or vulnerable it may be, and who is responsible if something goes wrong.

That uncertainty opens the door to misrepresentation of high-value goods, intentional under-description to avoid scrutiny, disputes that mask theft or diversion, and fraudulent claims after the fact.

Accurate classification closes those gaps by making freight clearly identifiable, consistently described, and defensible across the supply chain.

How Freight Classification Helps Prevent Fraud

Clear commodity descriptions reduce misrepresentation

The NMFC provides standardized commodity descriptions and classification guidance. When those descriptions are used correctly on the BOL, they reduce the ability to disguise freight.

Fraud risk increases when high-value electronics are described as “general merchandise,” branded goods are listed as “parts,” or finished products are misrepresented as raw materials. These tactics can lower perceived theft risk, bypass internal controls, and complicate recovery when freight disappears.

Accurate NMFC-based descriptions make it harder for bad actors to hide valuable or targeted freight behind vague language.

BOL accuracy is reinforced by NMFC rules and guidance

The NMFC doesn’t just assign classes, it includes rules governing BOL content and accuracy. Those rules establish expectations for complete and truthful shipment descriptions, correct application of NMFC items, and consistency between the freight tender, BOL, and actual shipment.

Many fraud schemes rely on paperwork discrepancies, where the BOL tells a different story than the tender, dock records, or physical freight. When classification rules are followed, discrepancies stand out faster, altered or forged BOLs are easier to detect, and internal teams have objective standards to reference when stopping a shipment.

Packaging is a fraud signal—not just a handling issue

Packaging is a defined freight characteristic within the NMFC and a key consideration for the FCDC. It directly affects handling requirements, damage risk, and liability exposure.

Packaging that doesn’t match the stated commodity, freight packaged like high-value goods but described as low-value, or inadequate packaging used to set up damage claims can all signal fraud.

When packaging aligns with the classified commodity, it reinforces credibility. When it doesn’t, it may indicate misclassification, concealment of true value, or intent to exploit liability rules.

Liability clarity limits post-theft and false-claim fraud

Liability is one of the most important freight characteristics evaluated through classification. The NMFC establishes how liability is influenced by commodity type, packaging quality, and declared characteristics.

Without classification discipline, fraud can appear as false damage claims after a diversion, disputes over responsibility when freight goes missing, or claims that exploit vague descriptions to shift blame.

Accurate classification creates clear liability expectations before the freight moves. That clarity reduces opportunistic claims, strengthens investigations, and limits the ability to use claims processes to mask fraud.

Classification supports pattern recognition and risk analysis

The FCDC evaluates freight characteristics such as density, stowability, handling, and liability. These same characteristics often correlate with fraud risk, including high-value or easily resold goods, shipments requiring special handling, and freight with unusual liability exposure.

When classification data is accurate and consistent, risk patterns are easier to identify, anomalies stand out across shipments, and industry-wide insights become possible.

Common fraud scenarios tied to poor classification

A “generic description” theft occurs when freight is vaguely described on the BOL, reducing scrutiny and making it easier for a fraudulent carrier to redirect or steal the load.

In a misclassification cover-up, inconsistent classification details after a theft make it difficult to determine what was actually shipped, slowing investigations and recovery.

Liability manipulation occurs when poor packaging or unclear classification is used to shift responsibility or support inflated claims after a staged loss.

In each case, accurate classification would have created friction, and friction is the enemy of fraud.

Making classification part of your fraud prevention strategy

To strengthen fraud defenses, classification should be treated as a risk control, not just a pricing step.

Practical steps include requiring NMFC-based commodity descriptions on every BOL, training dock and documentation teams to recognize misclassification red flags, verifying that packaging aligns with the stated classification, treating vague or inconsistent classification as a reason to pause and review, and aligning classification practices with digital data standards to reduce manual manipulation.

Final Takeaway

Freight fraud doesn’t start when a truck disappears, it often starts much earlier, with unclear, inaccurate, or inconsistent freight information.

Accurate freight classification strengthens BOL integrity, reinforces packaging and liability expectations, supports faster detection of anomalies, and reduces the opportunities fraudsters rely on.

In short, fraud prevention starts before the freight moves—at classification.

For more information on the NMFC, visit nmfta.org/nmfc.

For more details about the FCDC, visit an informative webpage.

Keith Peterson
Keith Peterson

Keith Peterson has more than two decades of experience in technical operations, customer success management, and both product and customer support. Currently serving as the Director of Operations for the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. (NMFTA)™, he plays a pivotal role in helping to advance the industry through classification and digitization.